[Loadstone] Signing Loadstone - problem

Gianfranco Giudice g.giudice at balcab.ch
Wed Feb 27 13:08:18 GMT 2008


Hi

I'm still not understanding why many Talks voices from Realspeak and
Scansoft do not require signing. 

-----Original Message-----
From: loadstone-bounces at loadstone-gps.com
[mailto:loadstone-bounces at loadstone-gps.com] On Behalf Of Shawn Kirkpatrick
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:19 AM
To: loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
Subject: Re: [Loadstone] Signing Loadstone - problem

That doesn't look like a valid option for the future. The process a user
could use is changing and it's not on the symbian site yet. It's also
getting harder for the person we currently have doing signing for a fee
since the images are getting harder to read. It'll just solve a lot of
problems for everyone if we can just sign the application and then have
available for download. This will only get worse as the first and second
edition phones get phaised out over time and we're left with more and more
third edition phones.

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Gianfranco Giudice wrote:

> Hello
>
> In this case it would be better continuing signing the application by 
> themselves.
> Those who need help could buy a service for $10. I prefer to donate 
> something to the project instead to pay Symbian for such stupid 
> restrictions.
>
> Gian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: loadstone-bounces at loadstone-gps.com
> [mailto:loadstone-bounces at loadstone-gps.com] On Behalf Of Shawn 
> Kirkpatrick
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:04 AM
> To: loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
> Subject: Re: [Loadstone] Signing Loadstone - problem
>
> The image is the least of our problems but I do aggree that it needs 
> to be fixed. As far as I know at the moment the symbian signing that 
> we use is offline but they say it's supposed to be fixed this week so who
knows.
> Unfortunately that site is the single point of failure for the whole 
> signing process and there's nothing we can do about it. Symbian 
> doesn't seem to care too much about this either as far as I can tell.
> For the next release of loadstone we hope to use the updated symbian 
> signing process so that users won't have to sign the application
themselves.
> Unfortunately this will cost the loadstone project $200 per year as 
> well as $20 per version released.
>
>  On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Gianfranco Giudice wrote:
>
>> I signed my file a couple of weeks ago but needed sighted help 
>> because of the capt character shown in an image only.
>> We should fight against this accessibility matter because Symbian is 
>> not interested to change this.
>> Write a lot of feedback on their site so they get pressure.
>>
>> Gian
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: loadstone-bounces at loadstone-gps.com
>> [mailto:loadstone-bounces at loadstone-gps.com] On Behalf Of Przemyslaw 
>> Rogalski
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:01 AM
>> To: LoadStone Lista
>> Subject: [Loadstone] Signing Loadstone - problem
>>
>> Hi all!
>> As far as I kwnow, it is not possible to get a .cer file to sign 
>> Loadstone at the moment.
>> True?
>> If so, is there any solution to get the signed application?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Loadstone mailing list
>> Loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
>> http://www.loadstone-gps.com/mailman/listinfo/loadstone
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Loadstone mailing list
>> Loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
>> http://www.loadstone-gps.com/mailman/listinfo/loadstone
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Loadstone mailing list
> Loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
> http://www.loadstone-gps.com/mailman/listinfo/loadstone
>
> _______________________________________________
> Loadstone mailing list
> Loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
> http://www.loadstone-gps.com/mailman/listinfo/loadstone
>
_______________________________________________
Loadstone mailing list
Loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
http://www.loadstone-gps.com/mailman/listinfo/loadstone



More information about the Loadstone mailing list