[Loadstone] Royaltek, Holux and QStarz compared.

Victor Tsaran vtsaran at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 23:09:15 BST 2007


Hello Monty,
I actually meant BT-359, not sure how different this unit is from the 338.
Vic

monty at loadstone-gps.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Funny that, the push button on the Globalsat 338 was a plus in my mind as 
> it can't accedently be left switched on as there is an automatic 10-minute 
> shutoff.  No need to see the leds as LS will work when its switched on and 
> if its not working the receiver is obviously switched off or has a flat 
> battery.
>
> I've also had an opportunity to test the Royaltek 2110 along side the 
> Globalsat 338  and the difference was negligible though admitedly 
> unscientific!
>
> That's the cool thing about choice and preferences - they make the world 
> go round!
>
> Best regards,
>    Monty
>
>   On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Dave Mielke wrote:
>
>   
>> [quoted lines by Victor Tsaran on 2007/07/10 at 09:42 -0700]
>>
>>     
>>> Is there any particular reason why Royaltech is so heavily considered on
>>> this list vs., for example, GlobalSat BT-359 or Holux GPSlim 240?
>>>       
>> While I can't speak for anyone else, I can tell you why I, personally, chose a
>> RoyalTek over a GlbalSat. The deciding factor was the power switch. The
>> GlobalSat I checked out had a pushbutton so, being blind and not being able to
>> look at the LEDs, I couldn't tell if the receiver was on or off. The RoyalTek,
>> on the other hand, has a sliding switch so it's easy for me to know if it's on
>> or off.
>>
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Loadstone mailing list
> Loadstone at loadstone-gps.com
> http://www.loadstone-gps.com/mailman/listinfo/loadstone
>
>   



More information about the Loadstone mailing list